Unified Theory of Everything (U=1)
A Simplified Theory of the Universe — Light as a Chain Reaction
Simplifying the Cosmos — Call it Quantum Chain Theory, Photon Chain Theory, Quantum Wave Theory, Quantum Lightwave Theory, Lightwave Propagation Theory, Photon Stacking Theory, Stacking Spaces Theory, Spatial Compression Theory, the Space Layering Model, the Photon Daisy Chain, the Quantum Web, or simply Space Stacking—all of these terms may well describe the ultimate Universal Equation: U=1. All other equations concerning reality are merely fractions of this whole.
Allow me to share with you an in-depth overview of my philosophical Unified Theory of Everything; U=1 because the Universe is the only whole thing in existence. This is a simplified theory of the 5D Universe with its double-torus field that describes general relativity, special relativity, and string theory all wrapped up into one divine theory. At its core are the concepts of quantized space and light as a chain-reacting point of energy moving through the fabric of spacetime that is the electromagnetic field. Please understand that I’m only rediscovering this after following the clues left by the ancients who must have known all of this since at least 6000 years ago.
I introduce to you the shape of…
Join me on this fascinating adventure of my core concepts…
Quantized Space:
The Universe is made up of discrete units that I’m calling quantized spaces, which were previously depicted by the ancients as the Seed of Life, or Egg of Life. These spaces can be compressed, decompressed, vibrated, induced, or stacked to provide all the properties of the Universe. These spaces act like fields where energy propagates, much like a chain reaction in dominoes or Newton's Cradle. These spaces are more compressed at the center of the Universe, and less compressed at the outer edges due to changes in pressure. The size of each space is more consistent around the middle of the Universe, similar to an accretion disk in an electromagnetic field, where spaces are stable enough to be injected with energy in the form of light. This uniform region allows light to slow down consistently to be visible and form matter, materializing reality from the singularity.
Propagation of Light:
Light moves as a perturbation in the field (a transient energy point), inducing a chain reaction in quantized spacetime—as dominoes remain fixed in position relative to the length of a course—light waves move through space by inducing the field, which is to say not as individual photons travelling across the cosmos but more like ocean waves. If photons do exist, they are these quantized units of relatively stationary and chain-reactionary spacetime. The interconnected, quantized nature of these spaces allows the fabric as a whole to behave like an infinitely expandable vector graphic, maintaining consistency in induction resistance regardless of scale or compression. Like with everything in the Universe, the flow of energy through this fabric is cyclical even while its direction may appear linear.
The red dot in this ocean-wave simulation is akin to an entire quantized space remaining in its relatively fixed position as energy moves through it.
Universe's Scale:
The observable Universe may only be a small fraction of its actual size. While we might be able to observe some 50 billion light-years in any direction, the Universe could be vastly larger.
Fifth Dimension (Perspective):
Perspective acts as a fifth dimension that influences how we perceive scale from macro to micro levels. Different perspectives form because distant light/matter remains material only in consistent quantized spaces. Perspective also accounts for both the vast scales of relativity and the minuscule dimensions of string theory. This is why objects lightyears away will become compressed in our view and still maintain their integrity, as a star off in the distance might appear to be just a speck of light but indeed that tiny dot contains all of its original information/data to be seen in full as we approach it. In essence, like in a computer-generated world, our existence is a point of vectorized data similar to a third-person adventure game.
Flower of Life Fabric Of Spacetime:
Quantized spaces expand in a 3D-patterned fabric resembling the Flower of Life, an ancient symbol of interconnected, vibrating circles (symbolizing bubble-like spheres that move and squish).
The Flower of Life is in turn made up of many connecting Seeds of Life (one central time circle linking together six outer inter-directional circles). The Seed of Life depicts the six micro dimensions of string theory.
The looping structure of each Seed of Life includes a central circle functioning as the primary path of light and is therefore the time dimension, setting the speed of light through its resistance. The dielectric constant explains the resistance in the fabric of time that limits the speed of light. Injected light energy increases the density/capacitance of these quantized spaces, causing them to fold in on themselves and appear as one, like stacking 2D tiles. This describes the process of light energy converting into matter and black holes densifying.
The Role of Gravity in the U=1 Framework
Essentially, zero is gravity, or perhaps better stated, the absence of zero is gravity.
The Universe is the only whole entity, and zero does not exist as a physical concept in nature. This fundamental principle leads us to a new understanding of gravity, described in the equation:
G≠0G \neq 0
This means that gravity is omnipresent because zero, as a concept, doesn't exist in nature. Therefore, the U=1 framework inherently results in the presence of gravitational influence at all times, maintaining the idea of universal interconnectedness and dynamic equilibrium.
In U=1, the lack of zero means there's no true void, leading to a universe in constant dynamic equilibrium. This interplay and connectivity among all parts create gravitational effects. The absence of zero is thus a fundamental reason for gravity's existence in my theory.
Current mathematical tools, which employ zero as a key syntactical element, may not be well-suited to explain the true nature of the universe. Historical examples show that not all math needs zero. Ancient civilizations like Egypt and Babylon operated without a formal concept of zero, and some modern mathematical areas like certain geometries and topology can work without it, too.
In essence, U=1 suggests a need to redefine our mathematical foundation, where our tools account for the wholeness of the universe and not rely on zero. This radical shift could lead us to a more accurate depiction of reality.
Gravity as an Emergent Phenomenon
In the U=1 framework, gravity is not a separate force but rather an emergent phenomenon arising from the inherent unity of the universe. Instead of viewing gravity as an isolated force acting at a distance, it can be seen as a natural result of the Universe's continuous dynamic equilibrium. This equilibrium is maintained by the constant interaction and connectivity of all parts of the universe, preventing any true voids from existing. Thus, gravity is a manifestation of the universe striving to maintain its unified state, ensuring all parts remain interconnected and balanced.
The 10 Dimensions Simplified As A 5D Universe:
We have our macro 3D reality, including forward and back, up and down, and left and right. We have the micro 7D reality (which ultimately only functions as two distinct dimensions), including a central time loop (the fourth dimension) with its six surrounding and looping circles connecting to the wider fabric (dimensions five through ten), all represented by the Flower- and Seed of Life. In essence, these six looping micro dimensions functionally combine to form the fifth dimension—perspective. In total, this explains the 10D Universe—the most basic form of string theory.
Stacking of Spaces:
Think of this as injected light energy causing quantized spaces to stack digitally thereby increasing the apparent capacitance by densifying them into a single space, explaining the transition of matter from light to hydrogen to helium and so on to all the other elements. This densification creates a warping effect on surrounding space (explaining Einstein's general relativity), as former spaces have seemingly vanished into the stacking, leaving a void in the spatial value of the fabric that sucks all the other quantized spaces around it inwards. Light moves quickly in decompressed space but slows down in stacked spaces due to the increased number of units it must traverse. The following wavelength periodic table helps to explain the process of matter formation in its totality.
(To enlarge: right-click, “open image in new tab”, click “command” with “+”)
Implications for Light and Density:
Denser materials slow down light propagation because these stacked spaces amount to extra quantized units of induction, explaining why denser materials appear less transparent. A key prediction of my theory is that elemental transparency varies according to how many times space folds in on itself to produce each element.
Electromagnetic Manifold:
The entirety of the universal manifold of quantized spaces resembles the lines of force in electromagnetism, directing matter outward from a central white hole in an accretion disk-like manner. As matter moves toward the outer edge, these spaces expand, and the relative speed of distant light increases when viewed from the middle-pressure zone of reality (explaining Einstein's special relativity).
Black Hole-Like Dematerialization:
At the edge of the Universe where quantized spaces become most expansive, the oldest matter in existence eventually exceeds the speed of light relative to the middle of the accretion disk causing it to de-materialize into the mathematical value of the whole and recycle back into existence as newly formed matter that re-injects into reality through the central white hole—the ultimate hydrogen jet—maintaining a cycle where energy is neither created nor destroyed, resulting in a dynamic, cyclical universe with neither beginning nor end. Carpe diem, everyone! There is no repeating this moment.
U=1, the Unified Universe as the Ultimate Singularity:
The entire mathematical form of the Universe is the singularity, a constantly recycling entity with everything being part of its whole. Neither creating nor destroying energy means that the Universe couldn’t possibly exist without you exactly as you are at this moment. We’re all perfect in the image of the Universe, which itself appears to be the highest form of consciousness. We are it, dreaming up and experiencing itself; like waves on a pond, we rise up only long enough to see the wave in front of us and curiously individuate ourselves before crashing into the shore and recycling back into the depths of the whole value of the pond from whence we came.
The Universe is simplicity (waves), unity (Seed of Life), and love (light).
For a more visual description, please check out my slideshow published on YouTube:
In summary, my Unified Theory of Everything describes a 5D universe where quantized spaces and light energy form the fundamental fabric, including our 3D experience, time as 4D, and perspective as 5D. This elegant simplicity echoes through everything, from the creation of elemental structures to the recycling energy of the cosmos, offering a fresh and profound view of the one and only Universe.
Please leave a comment if you enjoyed my wild imagination!
Shared elsewhere:
If it's anything, zero is gravity.
That equation may look like this:
G≠0G \neq 0
This means that gravity exists everywhere because zero, as a concept, doesn't exist in nature. Therefore, my U=1 framework would always result in the presence of gravitational influence, indicating a non-zero value for G at all times. This maintains the idea of universal interconnectedness and continuous dynamic equilibrium.
Any assumption about higher dimensions creating chaos and entropy, such as those in string thoery, might be influenced by our current mathematical framework, which heavily relies on zero. If—as my theory inherently suggests—zero doesn't naturally exist, this framework might not accurately describe higher-dimensional realities. By rethinking math without zero, we might find order and coherence where current models only see chaos.
With U=1, where the universe is a unified whole, this complexity might not introduce chaos but rather reflect different facets of the same entity. This unified perspective can offer a coherent framework for understanding these additional dimensions, especially when combined with a mathematical model that respects the principle that zero does not exist in nature.
In terms of my U=1 equation, a human mathematical framework does not seem to exist to explain nature, at least not one that is well understood in modern times. Virtually all of our modern mathematical tools employ the concept of zero as a key point of syntax.
Consider that if zero did exist in nature, I think the concept of counter pressure would not, which appears as an element of gravity as I describe it when quantized spaces stack together and seemingly vanish from the field, pulling everything around inward to make up for the vacancy.
In the U=1 framework, the absence of zero means there's no true void, leading to a universe in constant dynamic equilibrium. This interplay and connectivity among all parts create gravitational effects. The lack of zero is a fundamental reason for gravity's existence in my theory.
So zero really seems like a big hurdle for humanity to overcome in its thinking.
I'm suggesting 10 dimensions, which is the basis for the original string theory, compared to 11 dimensions of M-theory. My guess is that 11 would indeed create disorder within U=1. I think the most simple form of string theory maintains order and coherence in a universal singularity.
My guess is that further forms of string theory were only postulated because of the problem of zero.
As we already know, not all math needs zero. For example, in the ancient world, I think there was a civilization that once better understood the workings of the Universe, as made evident by their concepts of the fabric of the Universe symbolized by the Seed of Life.
It was my simple belief that this seven-ringed Seed of Life was an ancient code that awakened my focus on a 10D string theory. I somehow just knew I had to get to that goal, which after decades has led me here.
Early mathematics in civilizations like Egypt and Babylon got by without a formal concept of zero, and some modern areas of mathematics—like certain kinds of geometry and topological studies—can work without zero, too.
For example, the fact that the math of quantum field theory employs zero may be a reason why it gets so funky with its probabilistic nonsense. Clean up that math and we may see failing theories re-materialize as completed sections of math within the U=1 framework because the value of everything—relativity, string theory, QFT etc—would be part of this whole.
If math is to depict reality I think it must also need to mirror reality precisely. As it is currently designed, it simply doesn't do that.
The implication of U=1 is that zero, as a concept, doesn't exist in the physical universe. From this lack of zero we get all the pressures of the fabric pushing it to fold in on itself wherever a potential zero void might instead have existed.
Instead, we have zero as an abstract mathematical tool used to represent the absence of something in a way that fits human musings, not reality.
However, the reality of energy conservation aligns with my idea—mass and energy transform, but never become nothing. So, in natural terms, "zero" might be more a human construct than a reality.
For example, if a void appears in the fabric because one space has stacked on its neighbouring space, as I postulate, nature might indeed instantly fill it, as in fluid dynamics where pressure differences cause movement to equilibrate. This idea corresponds to fields in physics where forces act to fill absences or gaps, like gravity.
On the other hand, in algebra, zero serves as a pivotal element for equations and for defining null quantities, but this is still an abstraction. Algebra would need modification if zero were not to be a natural value.
If U=1 is to represent everything, current math seemingly needs revising to exclude zero in a natural sense. This could align with fields like topology, where spaces and transformations don't rely on zero in the conventional sense.
In terms of reality-based math, 1 becomes both everything and nothing specific. It encapsulates all but doesn't represent any singular subset within the Universe. This could indeed even make 1 a more abstract or philosophical concept than a practical one.
Imagine if we redefine 1 in reality-based math as the totality. It would shift our numerical foundation, where our math tools need to account for the wholeness of the Universe and not rely on the traditional unit-centric system.
With everything you know and feel intuitively about the Universe and modern humanity, do you actually think humans have devised the most true form of the Universal mathematical language to describe reality? It seems a tall order to fill.
Unfortunately for discussions like this, what I'm trying to explain is a radical shift, I know, and I think perhaps we need new math frameworks for a true theory of reality. I think it would be a grave and foolish mistake to attempt this with what we have today because ultimately it would just send us on another wild goose chase.
Instead, I suggest we aim to envision the geometric reality that I'm proposing rather than calculate it. It's very likely the best we can currently do if actual reality is the thing we are looking to define with the tools we have available today.
Here's my response to a comment elsewhere on Quantum Field Theory that is worth sharing here:
I'm fine if you want to call this a hypothesis. Perhaps you can take my work as a map to draft your own "true" mathematically inclined theory of it.
I must confess, my mind is geometrically/visually/spatially inclined, not algebraically. My sense of reality is heightened.
However, in the framework of my theory, I can easily explain and improve upon quantum field theory, which in my terms is perhaps more appropriate to call quantum chain theory.
QFT is fundamentally built on the idea that particles are excitations in fields. If I'm postulating that photons and other particles are not particles at all but some value of stationary quantized spaces within the fabric, I'm suggesting a shift away from QFT's imperfect language and conceptualization.
I'm redefining that what we perceive as particles are actually properties of the fabric of space itself, which fundamentally alters how we understand interactions and forces.
My focus is on fields and inductions, rather than excitations of fields, suggesting a more static, almost geometric conception of how energy and matter interact.
QFT sees particles like photons as excitations in their respective fields. In other words, a photon is an excitation in the electromagnetic field.
My theory proposes that what we consider particles, like photons, are not separate entities but rather stationary quantized spaces within the fabric of spacetime. When energy moves through these spaces, it creates what I call a "stacking" effect—these spaces compress or overlap to create densities.
By this logic, excitations in QFT represent perturbations or disturbances in the field, essentially points where the field's energy spikes.
Stacking quantized spaces could be seen as a form of “excitation,” where overlapping or compressing quantized spaces generate areas of higher energy density.
In both cases, there are localized regions of heightened energy. My theory re-imagines this in a geometric framework rather than a purely probabilistic one. So, while QFT and my theory might use different languages and concepts, there’s a core similarity—both involve concentrated energy in a field, leading to observable phenomena.